mexican restaurant: be used to eat at

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.74
, place
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, favorite
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.42
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat at 1.00
be used to eat raviolli 0.99
be used to eat 0.99
be used to eat in 0.99
be used to eat to get food 0.94
be used to eat out 0.93
be used to eat food 0.93
be used to eat to have lunch 0.90
be used to eat meal without cook 0.89
be used to eat dinner 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat out)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be used to eat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)