indian restaurant: be used to eat dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.73
, place
Weight: 0.54
, food
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to eat dinner 1.00
be used to dinner 0.95
be used to have dinner 0.94
be at dinner 0.94
be used to eat to have lunch 0.92
be used to eat meal without cook 0.91
be used to go out for dinner 0.90
be used to eat raviolli 0.89
be used to eat 0.89
be used to eat at 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(food, be at dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(food, be at dinner)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(food, be at dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(place, be used to eat to have lunch)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(mexican restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to eat raviolli)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(food, be at dinner)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to have lunch)