japanese restaurant: be used to have dinner

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.72
, bar
Weight: 0.64
, japan
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, everything
Weight: 0.51
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, chinese restaurant
Weight: 0.41
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, indian restaurant
Weight: 0.40
, mexican restaurant
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to have dinner 1.00
be used to dinner 0.97
be used to eat dinner 0.94
be used to go out for dinner 0.92
be used to order dinner 0.90
serve dinner 0.88
be used to have meal 0.87
be used to have good meal 0.86
be used to eat meal without cook 0.83
be used to dine 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(restaurant, serve dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(restaurant, serve dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, serve dinner)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to dine)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(restaurant, serve dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(restaurant, be used to dine)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(chinese restaurant, be used to go out for dinner)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to have meal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dine)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(restaurant, serve dinner)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to have meal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to have good meal)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(french restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(indian restaurant, be used to eat dinner)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(italian restaurant, be used to order dinner)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dinner)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to dine)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat meal without cook)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(japanese restaurant, be used to have dinner)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(restaurant, serve dinner)