bar: be called pubs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called pubs 1.00
be in pub 0.90
be called bars 0.79
be called roca bars 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(chocolate bar, be called roca bars)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(chocolate bar, be called roca bars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(chocolate bar, be called roca bars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bar, be called pubs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bar, be in pub)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(bar, be in pub)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bar, be in pub)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in pub)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(bar, be called bars)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(bar, be called bars)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(bar, be called bars)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called bars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called pubs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bar, be called pubs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called pubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(chocolate bar, be called roca bars)