bar: be in pub

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in pub 1.00
be called pubs 0.90
is bar 0.80
be called bar 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(karaoke, is bar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(karaoke, is bar) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(karaoke, is bar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bar, be in pub)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(bar, be called bar)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called pubs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bar, be called pubs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(bar, be called pubs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(bar, be called pubs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(bar, be called bar)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(bar, be called bar)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(bar, be called bar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in pub)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(bar, be in pub)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(bar, be in pub) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(karaoke, is bar)