bar: is kind healthy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents spot
Weight: 0.62
, candy bar
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings chocolate bar
Weight: 0.66
, japanese restaurant
Weight: 0.64
, bar stool
Weight: 0.63
, karaoke
Weight: 0.58
, disco
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
is kind healthy 1.00
is healthy 0.91
is big thing 0.79
has quality good 0.75
be good for business 0.75
is thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bar, is kind healthy)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(location, be good for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(karaoke, is big thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(karaoke, is thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(location, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(bar, is kind healthy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(karaoke, is big thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(karaoke, is big thing)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(karaoke, is thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(karaoke, is thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(bar, is kind healthy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bar, is kind healthy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(karaoke, is thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(karaoke, is big thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(bar, is kind healthy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(location, be good for business)