barbecue: be at michigan park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents event
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.60
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings grill
Weight: 0.61
, picnic
Weight: 0.36
, dinner
Weight: 0.36
, chili
Weight: 0.36
, bbq
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at michigan park 1.00
be at park 0.79
be at detroit 0.79
be at louisiana 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(bbq, be at louisiana)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(picnic, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(bbq, be at louisiana)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(bbq, be at louisiana)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(picnic, be at park)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(picnic, be at park)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grill, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(barbecue, be at michigan park)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at detroit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(barbecue, be at detroit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at detroit)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at detroit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at park)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(barbecue, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Salient(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(picnic, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bbq, be at louisiana)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)