grill: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, barbecue
Weight: 0.61
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, deli
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at michigan park 0.79
be at beach town 0.78
be at center of town 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(barbecue, be at park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(thing, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(thing, be at park)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be at michigan park)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at center of town)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(thing, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grill, be at park)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(barbecue, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grill, be at park)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grill, be at park)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(barbecue, be at michigan park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(grill, be at park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be at center of town)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be at center of town)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(grill, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(grill, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be at center of town)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(thing, be at park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(barbecue, be at michigan park)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(grill, be at park)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(seafood restaurant, be at beach town)