barre: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.52
, class
Weight: 0.45
, dancer
Weight: 0.44
, town
Weight: 0.40
, tyrant
Weight: 0.36
Siblings ballerina
Weight: 0.32
, treadmill
Weight: 0.31
, dancing
Weight: 0.31
, gym
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
has quality good 0.79
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gym, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gym, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(gym, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(treadmill, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(barre, has quality news)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(barre, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(barre, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(barre, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(barre, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality good)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(barre, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(gym, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(barre, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)