treadmill: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	machine Weight: 0.71 , device Weight: 0.62 , excercise Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.59 , fitness Weight: 0.58
Siblings	time machine Weight: 0.34 , fax machine Weight: 0.34 , laptop computer Weight: 0.34 , sewing machine Weight: 0.33 , computer keyboard Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
has quality bad	0.90
be harder than others	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(fitness, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(machine, has quality good)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality better)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(device, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality better)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.62

Plausible(fitness, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality better)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.03

Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(fax machine, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(sewing machine, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(sewing machine, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(treadmill, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(treadmill, has quality good)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality good)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(treadmill, has quality bad)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality bad)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality good)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(treadmill, has quality bad)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(treadmill, be harder than others)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(treadmill, be harder than others)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality good)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality bad)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(treadmill, be harder than others)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.60

Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, be harder than others)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(treadmill, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(sewing machine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.96

Typical(treadmill, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)