fax machine: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.75
, equipment
Weight: 0.74
, electronic device
Weight: 0.73
, telephone line
Weight: 0.72
Siblings mri machine
Weight: 0.38
, time machine
Weight: 0.38
, sewing machine
Weight: 0.37
, printer
Weight: 0.36
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality full 0.84
has quality system 0.84
has quality shit 0.79
has quality evil 0.78
is consistently awful 0.77
be bad for environment 0.77
be good in school 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(machine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mri machine, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(time machine, has quality full)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fax machine, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fax machine, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(mri machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mri machine, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(sewing machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(printer, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(time machine, has quality full) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(time machine, has quality full)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fax machine, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mri machine, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(time machine, has quality full)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sewing machine, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(fax machine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(machine, has quality good)