printer: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, network device
Weight: 0.65
, computer network
Weight: 0.65
Siblings cyan
Weight: 0.48
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.39
, computer
Weight: 0.37
, personal computer
Weight: 0.37
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is terrible 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(printer, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(printer, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(printer, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(printer, is terrible)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(printer, is terrible)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(printer, is terrible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(printer, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)