printer: is terrible

Related concepts

Parents	computer hardware Weight: 0.72 , electronic device Weight: 0.66 , network device Weight: 0.65 , computer network Weight: 0.65
Siblings	cyan Weight: 0.48 , laptop computer Weight: 0.39 , computer Weight: 0.37 , personal computer Weight: 0.37 , tablet computer Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is terrible	1.00
has quality bad	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(printer, is terrible)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(printer, is terrible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(network device, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(network device, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(computer network, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Plausible(computer network, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(printer, is terrible)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(network device, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(printer, is terrible)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(printer, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(printer, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(printer, has quality bad)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(printer, has quality bad)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(printer, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(printer, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Remarkable(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(network device, has quality bad)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.74

Typical(printer, is terrible) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(computer network, has quality bad)