fitness: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality worth 0.82
be bad for environment 0.80
be good for health 0.77
feel good 0.76
be good for us 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality worth)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(field, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(magazine, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(magazine, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(field, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(training, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(motivation, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(nutrition, be good for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(air conditioning, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(magazine, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(field, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(nutrition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nutrition, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(motivation, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(motivation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(training, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(training, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(nutrition, be good for health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(nutrition, be good for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(air conditioning, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(training, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(training, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(air conditioning, be bad for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, be bad for environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(air conditioning, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(air conditioning, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(fitness, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fitness, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(training, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(motivation, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(nutrition, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(training, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(air conditioning, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(air conditioning, be bad for environment)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(nutrition, be good for health)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(air conditioning, feel good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(field, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(magazine, has quality good)