goal: be good for us

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field goal
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings target
Weight: 0.62
, survival
Weight: 0.59
, retribution
Weight: 0.59
, fitness
Weight: 0.58
, hat trick
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for us 1.00
be good 0.89
be important for everyone 0.85
is great 0.84
be really 0.84
be important to everyone 0.82
be good place work 0.82
be good company work for 0.80
be from hell good 0.80
has quality good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(step, be from hell good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(step, be from hell good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(step, be from hell good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be important for everyone)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(survival, be really)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(survival, be good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be important to everyone)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(step, be from hell good)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(survival, be good)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(survival, be good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(survival, be really)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(survival, be really)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(fitness, be important to everyone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fitness, be important to everyone)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fitness, be important for everyone)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(fitness, be important for everyone)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, is great)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(target, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(goal, be good for us)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(goal, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(step, be from hell good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(survival, be really)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(survival, be good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fitness, be important to everyone)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fitness, be important for everyone)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(step, be from hell good)