target: is great

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great 1.00
is amazing 0.84
be good for us 0.84
feel good 0.83
has quality good 0.81
is big 0.80
is best 0.78
be good place work 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, is great)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, is great)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(target, is great)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(target, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(target, be good place work)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)