target: be good place work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents goal
Weight: 0.62
, competitor
Weight: 0.62
, option
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings face
Weight: 0.61
, head
Weight: 0.61
, command post
Weight: 0.60
, radar station
Weight: 0.59
, synagogue
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good place work 1.00
be good for us 0.82
be such bad place lift 0.81
be good company work for 0.81
work 0.81
feel good 0.81
be good company work 0.80
be set at work 0.78
be supposed work 0.78
be supposed work in dark 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(goal, work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(goal, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(option, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, work)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(goal, work)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(option, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(goal, be good for us)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(option, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(goal, work)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, be good place work)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(target, be good place work)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(target, be good company work for)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be set at work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(target, be set at work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(target, be good place work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(goal, work)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(option, work)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(goal, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(factor, work)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(target, be good place work)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)