goal: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field goal
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings target
Weight: 0.62
, survival
Weight: 0.59
, retribution
Weight: 0.59
, fitness
Weight: 0.58
, hat trick
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
be good 0.86
has quality change 0.86
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
is great 0.81
be good for us 0.80
be good company work for 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(field goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(field goal, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field goal, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(target, be good company work for)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(target, is great)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(survival, be good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(field goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fitness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(target, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(target, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(survival, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(survival, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(retribution, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(target, is great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(target, is great)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(target, be good company work for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(target, be good company work for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(goal, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(goal, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(goal, be good for us)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality worth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(goal, be good for us)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(goal, be good for us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(goal, be good for us)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(field goal, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(survival, be good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(target, is great)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(target, be good company work for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(goal, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(field goal, has quality worth)