goal: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents field goal
Weight: 0.65
, step
Weight: 0.61
, point
Weight: 0.61
, aspect
Weight: 0.60
Siblings target
Weight: 0.62
, survival
Weight: 0.59
, retribution
Weight: 0.59
, fitness
Weight: 0.58
, hat trick
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
has quality wrong 0.78
has quality change 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(field goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(field goal, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aspect, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(aspect, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(field goal, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(target, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fitness, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(field goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(aspect, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(fitness, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(fitness, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fitness, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(target, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(target, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(retribution, has quality wrong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(target, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(target, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(goal, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(goal, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(goal, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(goal, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goal, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(field goal, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fitness, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(retribution, has quality wrong)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(target, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(target, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(field goal, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(goal, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(aspect, has quality bad)