bartender: get tips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.66
, person
Weight: 0.62
, job
Weight: 0.58
, friend
Weight: 0.57
, employee
Weight: 0.57
Siblings waiter
Weight: 0.36
, waitress
Weight: 0.35
, janitor
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get tips 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(waitress, get tips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(waitress, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(waitress, get tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bartender, get tips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bartender, get tips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(waitress, get tips)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips)