waiter: get tips

Property	Similarity
get tips	1.00
need tips	0.98
work for tips	0.98
expect tips	0.93
complain about tips	0.93
rely on tips	0.91
deserve tips	0.90
demand tips	0.90
entitled to tips	0.90
get tips from credit cards	0.88

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(waiter, need tips)

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(waiter, work for tips)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(waiter, expect tips)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(waiter, complain about tips)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(waiter, need tips)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waiter, rely on tips)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(waiter, work for tips)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.97

Plausible(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips from credit cards)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(waiter, need tips)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(waiter, work for tips)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(waiter, rely on tips)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(waiter, rely on tips)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(waiter, expect tips)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(waiter, complain about tips)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(waiter, get tips from credit cards)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(waiter, complain about tips)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Salient(waiter, deserve tips)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips from credit cards)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(waiter, expect tips)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(waiter, need tips)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(waiter, expect tips)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(waiter, work for tips)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(waiter, rely on tips)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(waiter, get tips from credit cards)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Typical(waiter, get tips) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(waiter, complain about tips)

Parents	employee Weight: 0.69 , man Weight: 0.64 , worker Weight: 0.63 , job Weight: 0.62 , restaurant Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bartender Weight: 0.36 , italian restaurant Weight: 0.36 , receptionist Weight: 0.35 , policeman Weight: 0.35 , seafood restaurant Weight: 0.35

waiter: get tips

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings