waiter: deserve tips

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.69
, man
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
, job
Weight: 0.62
, restaurant
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bartender
Weight: 0.36
, italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, receptionist
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
deserve tips 1.00
need tips 0.91
get tips 0.90
work for tips 0.89
expect tips 0.89
complain about tips 0.87
entitled to tips 0.86
rely on tips 0.85
get tips from credit cards 0.84
demand tips 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(bartender, get tips)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(bartender, get tips)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(bartender, get tips)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(waiter, deserve tips)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(waiter, need tips)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(waiter, need tips)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(waiter, get tips)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(waiter, work for tips)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(waiter, expect tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(waiter, rely on tips)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(waiter, complain about tips)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(waiter, rely on tips)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, expect tips)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, work for tips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(waiter, need tips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(waiter, complain about tips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(waiter, work for tips)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, get tips)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(waiter, complain about tips)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(waiter, get tips from credit cards)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, work for tips)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(waiter, expect tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(waiter, complain about tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(waiter, rely on tips)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(waiter, entitled to tips)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(waiter, get tips)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(waiter, expect tips)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(waiter, need tips)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(waiter, rely on tips)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(waiter, deserve tips)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(waiter, deserve tips)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(bartender, get tips)