bat: be considered as mammal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, enemy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings vampire bat
Weight: 0.73
, fruit bat
Weight: 0.68
, bunt
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as mammal 1.00
is mammal 0.96
be considered mammals 0.91
is flying mammal 0.89
be called mammals 0.88
is mammals 0.87
be classified as mammals 0.86
is classified as mammals 0.86
be same as mammals 0.86
be different from mammals 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, is mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, is mammal)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(bat, be considered as mammal)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammal)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bat, is mammal)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammals)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bat, be classified as mammals)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bat, is mammals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bat, is mammal)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(bat, is mammal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(bat, is mammals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bat, is mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(bat, be classified as mammals)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(bat, be classified as mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(bat, be classified as mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, is mammal)