bat: is mammal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, enemy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings vampire bat
Weight: 0.73
, fruit bat
Weight: 0.68
, bunt
Weight: 0.37
, tree frog
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is mammal 1.00
be considered as mammal 0.96
is flying mammal 0.92
is mammals 0.90
be called mammals 0.89
be considered mammals 0.88
have instead of reptiles mammals 0.86
be different from mammals 0.86
be related to mammals 0.85
be same as mammals 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.01
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fruit bat, is mammal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(fruit bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(fruit bat, is mammal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(bat, is mammal)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bat, be considered as mammal)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammals)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(bat, is mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(bat, be considered as mammal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(bat, is mammals)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(bat, is mammal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(bat, is mammal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(fruit bat, is mammal)