bathroom: have heat lamps

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents laundry room
Weight: 0.79
, room
Weight: 0.65
, space
Weight: 0.63
, shower door
Weight: 0.57
Siblings living room
Weight: 0.73
, shower curtain
Weight: 0.72
, bedroom
Weight: 0.68
, toilet paper
Weight: 0.68
, locker room
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
have heat lamps 1.00
have lights 0.80
have red lights 0.78
affect heat 0.77
have blue lights 0.77
have lighting 0.77
have black lights 0.77
have bad lighting 0.76
have harsh lighting 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(room, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(room, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(room, have lighting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(room, have red lights)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(room, have red lights)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(room, have bad lighting)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(room, have lighting)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(locker room, have lighting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(room, have red lights)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(room, have bad lighting)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(room, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(locker room, have lighting)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(locker room, have lighting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(bathroom, have heat lamps)

Similarity expansion

0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have black lights)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have blue lights)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have red lights)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(bathroom, have black lights)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(bathroom, have red lights)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(bathroom, have blue lights)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have black lights)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have red lights)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(bathroom, have blue lights)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(bathroom, have black lights)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(bathroom, have red lights)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(bathroom, have blue lights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(room, have lighting)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, have red lights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(locker room, have lighting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(room, have lighting)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(room, have bad lighting)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(bathroom, have heat lamps)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(room, have red lights)