bc: have many fires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.52
, city
Weight: 0.51
, item
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.49
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, lexington
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, victoria
Weight: 0.33
, montreal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have many fires 1.00
get many fires 0.99
have fires 0.97
get fires 0.96
have many wildfires 0.89
have wildfires 0.86
be on fire 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bc, have many fires)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bc, have fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bc, have fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bc, get fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bc, get many fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bc, get many fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bc, have fires)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bc, get fires)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bc, get fires)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bc, get many fires)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bc, get many fires)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bc, have wildfires)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bc, get fires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(bc, be on fire)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(bc, be on fire)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(bc, be on fire)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bc, have fires)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many wildfires)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bc, have many wildfires)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bc, have wildfires)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bc, have many wildfires)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bc, have many wildfires)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(bc, be on fire)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many fires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(bc, have many fires)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bc, have many fires)