bc: have wildfires

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.52
, city
Weight: 0.51
, item
Weight: 0.50
, program
Weight: 0.49
Siblings venice
Weight: 0.33
, lexington
Weight: 0.33
, springfield
Weight: 0.33
, victoria
Weight: 0.33
, montreal
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wildfires 1.00
have many wildfires 0.99
have fires 0.87
get fires 0.86
have many fires 0.86
get many fires 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(bc, have wildfires)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many wildfires)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bc, have many wildfires)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bc, have many wildfires)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(bc, get fires)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(bc, have fires)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bc, get fires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(bc, have fires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(bc, have many wildfires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(bc, get many fires)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bc, get fires)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bc, have fires)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bc, have fires)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(bc, get fires)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(bc, have many fires)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(bc, get many fires)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bc, get many fires)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bc, have many fires)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bc, get many fires)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bc, have many fires)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(bc, have many fires)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(bc, have wildfires)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(bc, have wildfires)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(bc, have wildfires)