bear: be called bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called bears 1.00
get called bears 0.98
is calledblack bears 0.98
is bears 0.98
be called black bears 0.95
be bears same 0.93
be different from bears 0.92
is dangerous bears 0.92
eat bears 0.92
be different than bears 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat bears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(koala, be called bears)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be called bears)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be different from bears)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be called black bears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(black bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(black bear, be called bears)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(black bear, is calledblack bears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(black bear, be called black bears)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(black bear, be called black bears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(koala, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(koala, be called bears)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(black bear, be different from bears)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(black bear, be different from bears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(polar bear, eat bears)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat bears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bear, be called bears)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bear, eat bears)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(bear, eat bears)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bear, eat bears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bear, be called bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(black bear, be called black bears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(black bear, be called bears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(black bear, be different from bears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat bears)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(koala, be called bears)