bear: eat bears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat bears 1.00
eat other bears 0.98
is calledblack bears 0.93
is bears 0.93
get called bears 0.92
be called bears 0.92
kill bears 0.91
be bears same 0.90
eat polar bears 0.90
kill other bears 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat bears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(koala, be called bears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat polar bears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(black bear, be called bears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(polar bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat bears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(black bear, is calledblack bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(black bear, be called bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(black bear, be called bears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(koala, be called bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(koala, be called bears)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(polar bear, eat polar bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat polar bears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(bear, eat bears)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(bear, be called bears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(bear, be called bears)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(bear, be called bears)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(bear, be called bears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bear, eat bears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(black bear, is calledblack bears)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(black bear, be called bears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat bears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(koala, be called bears)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat bears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat polar bears)