bear: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.68
, wild animal
Weight: 0.66
, carnivore
Weight: 0.64
Siblings black bear
Weight: 0.86
, polar bear
Weight: 0.79
, giant panda
Weight: 0.60
, panda
Weight: 0.59
, koala
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part tail 0.89
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part claws 0.83
has physical part whiskers 0.82
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part toes 0.82
has physical part hair 0.82
has physical part noses 0.81
has physical part paws 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(bear, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part tail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(bear, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part tail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part claws)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(bear, has physical part claws)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(bear, has physical part claws)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part claws)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bear, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(bear, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, has physical part whiskers)