beauty: is good movie

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fairy tale
Weight: 0.65
, quality
Weight: 0.63
, gift
Weight: 0.62
, characteristic
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hair salon
Weight: 0.68
, glory
Weight: 0.65
, grace kelly
Weight: 0.64
, waterfall
Weight: 0.59
, samantha
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good movie 1.00
is movie 0.95
be movies 0.86
be similar movies 0.84
is ungiven good 0.79
be on netflix bad 0.78
be in back theaters 0.77
be in theaters 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beauty, is good movie)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on netflix bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beauty, is good movie)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(quality, be on netflix bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(beauty, is good movie)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(beauty, is good movie)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(beauty, is movie)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(beauty, is movie)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is movie)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beauty, be similar movies)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(beauty, be similar movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be similar movies)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(beauty, is movie)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(beauty, be similar movies)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(beauty, be in back theaters)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(beauty, be in back theaters)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(beauty, be in back theaters)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(beauty, be in back theaters)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(beauty, is good movie)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(quality, be on netflix bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(beauty, is good movie)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)