beaver: be at canada

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, wild animal
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, fish
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at canada 1.00
be at dammed-up stream in canada 0.93
be defined as national animal of canada 0.88
be at australia 0.87
be at quebec 0.80
be at america 0.79
be at british columbia 0.77
be at montreal 0.77
be at ontario 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fish, be at australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at australia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(fish, be at australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(beaver, be at canada)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beaver, be at australia)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(beaver, be at canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(fish, be at australia)