beaver: be at ontario

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.77
, wild animal
Weight: 0.73
, animal
Weight: 0.70
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, fish
Weight: 0.62
Siblings grizzly bear
Weight: 0.38
, elk
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, wolf
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ontario 1.00
be at montreal 0.81
be at quebec 0.78
be at saginaw michigan 0.78
be at michigan 0.78
be at canada 0.77
be at montana 0.76
be at dammed-up stream in canada 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beaver, be at ontario)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(beaver, be at michigan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at montreal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(beaver, be at montreal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(beaver, be at montana)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(beaver, be at canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(beaver, be at michigan)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at montana)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at montreal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(beaver, be at montreal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(beaver, be at michigan)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at canada)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(beaver, be at montana)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at michigan)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at montana)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at saginaw michigan)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(beaver, be at dammed-up stream in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(beaver, be at ontario)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(beaver, be at ontario) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(beaver, be at ontario)