beech: has shape bend

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.61
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has shape bend 1.00
has shape tree 0.78
has shape trees 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has shape tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(oak tree, has shape tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has shape tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beech, has shape bend)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beech, has shape tree)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beech, has shape trees)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(beech, has shape tree)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beech, has shape tree)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(beech, has shape trees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(beech, has shape trees)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape tree)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape bend)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beech, has shape bend)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape bend) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(oak tree, has shape tree)