beech: has shape trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deciduous tree
Weight: 0.72
, species
Weight: 0.67
, tree
Weight: 0.61
, hardwood
Weight: 0.57
, variety
Weight: 0.55
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.39
, birch
Weight: 0.39
, oak
Weight: 0.39
, maple tree
Weight: 0.39
, douglas fir
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has shape trees 1.00
has shape tree 0.95
has shape bend 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(oak tree, has shape tree)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(oak tree, has shape tree) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(oak tree, has shape tree)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(beech, has shape trees)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(beech, has shape tree)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(beech, has shape tree)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(beech, has shape tree)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape tree)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(beech, has shape bend)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(beech, has shape bend)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(beech, has shape bend)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape bend)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(beech, has shape trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(beech, has shape trees) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(oak tree, has shape tree)