beef: be best in europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.69
, dark meat
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.65
, raw material
Weight: 0.64
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.65
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, pork
Weight: 0.37
, lamb
Weight: 0.37
, meat pie
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best in europe 1.00
be in sweden better 0.82
be expensive in germany 0.82
be popular in america 0.80
be expensive in france 0.80
be expensive in usa 0.79
be popular in greece 0.79
be in sweden 0.79
be in switzerland 0.79
be expensive in japan 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beef, be best in europe)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beef, be best in europe)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(meat, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beef, be best in europe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(meat, be expensive in japan)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(meat, be expensive in japan)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be in sweden better)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be in sweden)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden better)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(dairy product, be in sweden)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(meat, be expensive in japan)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(beef, be best in europe)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(lamb, be expensive in usa)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(beef, be best in europe)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(beef, be expensive in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(beef, be expensive in japan)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(beef, be expensive in japan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(beef, be expensive in japan)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(beef, be popular in america)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beef, be best in europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive in japan)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dairy product, be in sweden better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dairy product, be in sweden)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(lamb, be expensive in usa)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(meat, be expensive in japan)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(dairy product, be in sweden better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(beef, be best in europe)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dairy product, be in sweden)