bell ringer: is weak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weak 1.00
is weak anyway 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bell ringer, is weak)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(bell ringer, is weak anyway)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak anyway)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bell ringer, is weak anyway)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak anyway)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak)