bell ringer: is weak anyway

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
is weak anyway 1.00
is weak 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(bell ringer, is weak anyway)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bell ringer, is weak)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(bell ringer, is weak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bell ringer, is weak anyway)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(bell ringer, is weak anyway) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(bell ringer, is weak anyway)