belly: is fat bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.55
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
, body part
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.33
, nipple
Weight: 0.33
, chin
Weight: 0.33
, human body
Weight: 0.32
, nose
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fat bad 1.00
get fat 0.95
is fat hard 0.93
is fat dangerous 0.92
is fat cold 0.91
is fat harmful 0.91
lose fat 0.89
has fatness fat 0.88
fat take go 0.87
is fat stubborn 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stomach, has fatness fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stomach, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stomach, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat bad)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(belly, get fat)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(belly, get fat)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(belly, is fat hard)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(belly, is fat hard)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat dangerous)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(belly, is fat bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stomach, has fatness fat)