belly: is fat harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.55
, symptom
Weight: 0.55
, body part
Weight: 0.55
Siblings stomach
Weight: 0.33
, nipple
Weight: 0.33
, chin
Weight: 0.33
, human body
Weight: 0.32
, nose
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fat harmful 1.00
is fat dangerous 0.93
is fat bad 0.91
get fat 0.88
is harmful 0.88
is fat hard 0.87
is fat cold 0.85
lose fat 0.84
has fatness fat 0.84
fat take go 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(stomach, has fatness fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(stomach, has fatness fat)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(stomach, has fatness fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(belly, is fat harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat dangerous)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(belly, is fat dangerous)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(belly, get fat)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(belly, is fat bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(belly, is harmful)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(belly, is fat dangerous)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(belly, is fat hard)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(belly, get fat)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(belly, is harmful)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(belly, is fat bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(belly, is fat cold)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(belly, is fat hard)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(belly, get fat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(belly, is harmful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(belly, has fatness fat)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(belly, lose fat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(belly, is fat cold)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(belly, is fat hard)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(belly, has fatness fat)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(belly, lose fat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(belly, is fat cold)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(belly, has fatness fat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(belly, lose fat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat dangerous)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(belly, get fat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat hard)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat cold)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(belly, has fatness fat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(belly, is harmful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(belly, lose fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(belly, is fat harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(belly, is fat harmful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(stomach, has fatness fat)