beverage: go down wrong tube

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.78
, segment
Weight: 0.61
, snack
Weight: 0.61
, item
Weight: 0.59
, liquor
Weight: 0.58
Siblings soda pop
Weight: 0.71
, white wine
Weight: 0.70
, hot coffee
Weight: 0.69
, vodka
Weight: 0.67
, beer
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
go down wrong tube 1.00
go down tube 0.95
go flat 0.76
go bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(liquor, go bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(liquor, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(liquor, go bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(soda pop, go flat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(white wine, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(liquor, go bad)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(soda pop, go flat)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(soda pop, go flat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(white wine, go bad)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(white wine, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(beverage, go down wrong tube)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(beverage, go down tube)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(beverage, go down tube)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down tube)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(beverage, go down tube)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(beverage, go flat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(beverage, go flat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go flat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(beverage, go bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(beverage, go bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(beverage, go flat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(beverage, go bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(liquor, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(soda pop, go flat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(white wine, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(beverage, go down wrong tube)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(liquor, go bad)