bicycle: be made of aluminum

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vehicle
Weight: 0.67
, toy
Weight: 0.62
, object
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
, machine
Weight: 0.61
Siblings bike
Weight: 0.38
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.37
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.37
, police car
Weight: 0.37
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made of aluminum 1.00
be made of metal 0.86
be made of titanium 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be made of metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(motorcycle, be made of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be made of metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bicycle, be made of aluminum)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be made of titanium)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(bicycle, be made of titanium)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be made of metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(bicycle, be made of titanium)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(bicycle, be made of metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(bicycle, be made of metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(bicycle, be made of titanium)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(bicycle, be made of metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be made of aluminum)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(bicycle, be made of aluminum)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(bicycle, be made of aluminum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be made of metal)