bill: become in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents provision
Weight: 0.74
, proposal
Weight: 0.74
, policy
Weight: 0.67
, measure
Weight: 0.66
Siblings dollar bill
Weight: 0.76
, act
Weight: 0.61
, passage
Weight: 0.59
, spending
Weight: 0.58
, caucus
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
become in canada 1.00
be important to canada 0.94
is uk 0.81
be capital of australia 0.78
be o'reilly perceived in america 0.78
be becomes law in philippines 0.77
be important to america 0.77
is xp 0.76
o'reilly hate america 0.76
america today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bill, become in canada)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(policy, america today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bill, become in canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(policy, america today)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, is xp)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(policy, is xp)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(policy, america today)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(spending, is xp)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(act, be capital of australia)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(passage, be important to canada)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(spending, is uk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, is xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bill, become in canada)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(policy, america today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(bill, become in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(spending, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(spending, is uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(passage, be important to canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(passage, be important to canada)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(spending, is xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(spending, is xp)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(act, be capital of australia) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(act, be capital of australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(bill, become in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(bill, o'reilly hate america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(bill, be becomes law in philippines)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bill, be o'reilly perceived in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, be important to america)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(bill, o'reilly hate america)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(bill, become in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(policy, america today)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, is xp)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(spending, is uk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(spending, is xp)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(act, be capital of australia)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(passage, be important to canada)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(policy, america today)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(bill, become in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(policy, is xp)