binding: is active site

Related concepts

Parents	agreement Weight: 0.59 , document Weight: 0.59 , process Weight: 0.58 , matter Weight: 0.58
Siblings	phagocytosis Weight: 0.32 , negotiable instrument Weight: 0.32 , hydrolysis Weight: 0.32 , compromise Weight: 0.31 , declaration Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is active site	1.00
is site	0.87
is active	0.87
is active site reversible	0.85
is active site readily reversible	0.80
is sites	0.80
is active transport	0.79
be example of active transport	0.78
require active transport	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(process, require active transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(binding, is active site)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(process, require active transport)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(process, require active transport)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active transport)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(process, require active transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(binding, is active site)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, is active)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

Remarkable(phagocytosis, is active transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, is active transport)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(phagocytosis, be example of active transport) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(binding, is active site)

Similarity expansion

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(binding, is site)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site reversible)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(binding, is sites)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is site)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(binding, is site)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site readily reversible)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(binding, is sites)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(binding, is sites)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(binding, is active site reversible)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(binding, is active site readily reversible)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(binding, is site)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(binding, is sites)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(binding, is active site reversible)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(binding, is active site reversible)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(binding, is active site readily reversible)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(binding, is active site readily reversible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(binding, is active site)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(process, require active transport)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(phagocytosis, is active)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(phagocytosis, be example of active transport)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(phagocytosis, is active transport)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(binding, is active site) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(process, require active transport)