biodiversity: be higher in tropics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be higher in tropics 1.00
be high in tropics 0.97
be rich in tropics 0.92
be high in tropical rainforest 0.83
be high in tropical rainforests 0.82
be highest in tropical rainforest 0.82
be greater closer to equator 0.80
be higher in areas with water 0.77
be high in rainforest 0.75
be higher in in open sea 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be higher in in open sea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in in open sea)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in in open sea)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be higher in in open sea)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)