biodiversity: be rich in tropics

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be rich in tropics 1.00
be high in tropics 0.94
be higher in tropics 0.92
be high in tropical rainforests 0.85
be high in tropical rainforest 0.84
be highest in tropical rainforest 0.81
be high in rainforests 0.77
be high in rainforest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be higher in tropics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in rainforests)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be high in tropical rainforests)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be rich in tropics)