biodiversity: be important to ecosystem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, resource
Weight: 0.58
, concept
Weight: 0.57
, carbon
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ecology
Weight: 0.34
, desertification
Weight: 0.34
, conservation
Weight: 0.34
, carbon tetrachloride
Weight: 0.33
, coral reef
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystem 1.00
important to ecosystem 1.00
be good for ecosystem 0.96
help ecosystem 0.95
affect ecosystem 0.95
be related to ecosystem 0.95
be important within ecosystem 0.94
create ecosystem 0.93
be important factor to ecosystem 0.92
be important for ecosystems 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(resource, affect ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(resource, affect ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important factor to ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(biodiversity, affect ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biodiversity, help ecosystem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biodiversity, create ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, important to ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be related to ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(biodiversity, be important factor to ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important factor to ecosystem)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important within ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be important factor to ecosystem)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be good for ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(resource, affect ecosystem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(biodiversity, be important to ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(resource, affect ecosystem)