biologist: classify fruit bats in different animal groups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
classify fruit bats in different animal groups 1.00
classify fruit bats in animal groups 0.99
classify animals 0.84
classify organisms into groups 0.82
classify sponges as animals 0.80
actually identify species 0.79
categorize species 0.78
classify organisms 0.77
classify living organisms 0.77
classify viruses as non living 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biologist, classify animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify animals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(biologist, classify animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biologist, classify organisms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify organisms)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(biologist, classify viruses as non living)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(biologist, classify viruses as non living)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(biologist, classify organisms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify viruses as non living)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify viruses as non living)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify animals)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify organisms)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)