biologist: classify sponges as animals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
classify sponges as animals 1.00
classify animals 0.87
classify organisms 0.84
classify living organisms 0.82
classify organisms into groups 0.82
classify organism 0.80
classify fruit bats in animal groups 0.80
classify fruit bats in different animal groups 0.80
categorize species 0.80
classify things 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scientist, classify things)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(scientist, classify things)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(scientist, classify things)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(scientist, classify things)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biologist, classify organisms)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(biologist, classify animals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(biologist, classify organism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(biologist, classify things)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify organisms)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify animals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(biologist, classify animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(biologist, classify organisms)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify organism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify things)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(biologist, classify organism)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(biologist, classify things)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify animals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(biologist, classify fruit bats in different animal groups)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify organisms into groups)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify living organisms)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify organisms)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify organism)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify things)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(scientist, classify things)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(biologist, classify sponges as animals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(scientist, classify things)