biologist: use classification system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.71
, researcher
Weight: 0.62
, specialist
Weight: 0.55
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.55
Siblings naturalist
Weight: 0.64
, stephen jay gould
Weight: 0.58
, geologist
Weight: 0.58
, ecologist
Weight: 0.54
, botanist
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
use classification system 1.00
use classification 0.97
use classification system study 0.95
use classifications 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(biologist, use classification system)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification system study)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classifications)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(biologist, use classification)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(biologist, use classifications)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(biologist, use classification system study)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(biologist, use classifications)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(biologist, use classifications)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(biologist, use classification system study)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system study)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(biologist, use classification system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(biologist, use classification system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(biologist, use classification system)